惠普Pavilion 14笔记本电脑评测：时尚的全能手，屏幕也很亮决定性的风扇。 借助Pavilion 14-ce3040ng，惠普推出了基于英特尔全新Ice Lake架构的1,000欧元（约合1,109美元）的全能笔记本。 正如我们的测试结果所示，这台14英寸显示器有一些奇怪的特点。Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (translated by Zewei Shen), Published 03/05/2020 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
🇫🇷 🇮🇹 🇪🇸 🇷🇺 🇳🇱 🇸🇪 🇵🇹 🇭🇺 Ice Lake Geforce Gaming Laptop / Notebook
Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de
Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ngProcessorIntel Core i7-1065G7 4 x 1.3 - 3.9 GHz, Ice Lake-UGraphics adapterNVIDIA GeForce MX250 - 4 GB VRAM, Core: 1519 MHz, RAM: 1500 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 441.87, OptimusMemory16 GB , DDR4-3200, 单通道Display14.00 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPI, AUO543D, IPS, Full-HD, 60 Hz, glossy: noMainboardIntel 495 (Ice Lake-U PCH-LP Premium)StorageToshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02, 1024 GB , M.2 NVMe-SSDSoundcardIntel Ice Point-LP PCH - cAVSConnections3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米耳机和麦克风插孔组合, Card Reader: SD,SDHC,SDXCNetworkingRealtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5Sizeheight x width x depth (in mm): 18 x 327 x 226Battery41 Wh Lithium-Ion, 41瓦•时锂电池Operating SystemMicrosoft Windows 10 Home 64 BitCameraWebcam: HDAdditional featuresSpeakers: 2.0, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 65-watt power supply, Quick Start Guide, 24 Months WarrantyWeight1.55 kg, Power Supply: 222 g
Price1000 EURLinksHP homepageNote: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.see all specifications
4 Reviews ← exclude selected types
RatingDateModelWeightHeightSizeResolutionPrice
77.8 %v7 (old)03 / 2020HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ngi7-1065G7, GeForce MX2501.6 kg18 mm14.00"1920x1080
84.9 %v6 (old)02 / 2020Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWLi5-8265U, GeForce MX2501.4 kg15.9 mm14.00"1920x1080
84.2 %v7 (old)Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723Li7-8565U, GeForce MX2501.8 kg17.95 mm15.60"1920x1080
82.6 %v6 (old)09 / 2019Asus VivoBook S15 S532Fi7-8565U, GeForce MX2501.8 kg18 mm15.60"1920x1080
Device comparison
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L Asus VivoBook S15 S532F HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL DIN A4 ❌
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)Average of class Multimedia (19.3 - 198, n=49, last 2 years)
99.9 MB/s +212%Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
82.9 MB/s +159%Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
69.1 MB/s +116%Asus VivoBook S15 S532F (Toshiba Exceria Pro UHS-II)
33.3 MB/s +4%HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
32 MB/s maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)Average of class Multimedia (26.1 - 262, n=49, last 2 years)
140.3 MB/s +325%Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
89.9 MB/s +172%Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
81.8 MB/s +148%Asus VivoBook S15 S532F (Toshiba Exceria Pro UHS-II)
35.6 MB/s +8%HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
33 MB/s
359cd/m²378cd/m²359cd/m²375cd/m²395cd/m²376cd/m²378cd/m²382cd/m²377cd/m²
Distribution of brightnessAUO543D tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2Maximum: 395 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 375.4 cd/m² Minimum: 28 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 91 %Center on Battery: 395 cd/m²Contrast: 1519:1 (Black: 0.26 cd/m²)ΔE Color 5.92 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.84, calibrated: 0.91ΔE Greyscale 6.69 | 0.09-98 Ø5.198% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)63% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)68.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)98.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)66.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)Gamma: 2.78Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ngAUO543D, IPS, 1920x1080, 14"Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWLNV140FHM-N48, IPS, 1920x1080, 14"Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723LBOE NV156FHM-N48, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"Asus VivoBook S15 S532FLG Philips LP156WFC-SPD1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"Display-40%-40%-44% Display P3 Coverage66.540.1 -40%40.02 -40%37.12 -44% sRGB Coverage98.459.2 -40%58.5 -41%55.9 -43% AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage68.241.43 -39%41.34 -39%38.35 -44%Response Times14%8%39% Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *60.8 ?(29.2, 31.6)39.6 ?(21.6, 18) 35%45 ?(23, 22) 26%24.8 ?(12.8, 12) 59% Response Time Black / White *29.6 ?(13.2, 16.4)32 ?(18, 14) -8%33 ?(18, 15) -11%24 ?(14, 10) 19% PWM Frequency352.1 ?(99)250 ?(90)Screen-55%-50%-69%Brightness middle395316 -20%278 -30%262.3 -34%Brightness375301 -20%271 -28%250 -33%Brightness Distribution9188 -3%89 -2%89 -2%Black Level *0.260.28 -8%0.26 -0%0.43 -65%Contrast15191129 -26%1069 -30%610 -60%Colorchecker dE 2000 *5.925.3 10%4.73 20%5.81 2%Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *9.7918.5 -89%8.38 14%14.7 -50%Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *0.914.8 -427%5.17 -468%5.36 -489%Greyscale dE 2000 *6.692.4 64%2.59 61%2.8 58%Gamma2.78 79%2.05 107%2.38 92%2.15 102%CCT7596 86%6644 98%6160 106%7016 93%Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)6337.6 -40%36 -43%35.2 -44%Color Space (Percent of sRGB)9858.3 -41%58 -41%55.6 -43%Total Average (Program / Settings)-27% /
-43%-27% /
-41%-25% /
-51%* ... smaller is better
Display Response TimesℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to White29.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13.2 ms rise↘ 16.4 ms fallThe screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 78 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.5 ms). ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey60.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 29.2 ms rise↘ 31.6 ms fallThe screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 96 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.1 ms).
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)ℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.Screen flickering / PWM not detectedIn comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8360 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Core i7-1065G7: Ø625 (592.25-691) Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel Core i5-8265U: Ø548 (543.22-613.69) Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel Core i7-8565U: Ø470 (467.49-492.88) Asus VivoBook S15 S532F Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel Core i7-8565U: Ø502 (489.9-680.49)
Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R20 Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64BitAverage of class Multimedia (99.6 - 323, n=73, last 2 years)
262 Points +38%HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ngIntel Core i7-1065G7
190 Points Asus VivoBook S15 S532FIntel Core i7-8565U
168 Points -12%Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723LIntel Core i7-8565U
165 Points -13%Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWLIntel Core i5-8265U
152 Points -20% CPU Multi 64BitAverage of class Multimedia (856 - 5224, n=78, last 2 years)
2493 Points +261%HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ngIntel Core i7-1065G7
691 Points Asus VivoBook S15 S532FIntel Core i7-8565U
680 Points -2%Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWLIntel Core i5-8265U
600 (548.41min - 619.74max) Points -13%Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723LIntel Core i7-8565U
493 Points -29%Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)Average of class Multimedia (341 - 853, n=71, last 2 years)
671 Points +42%HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ngIntel Core i7-1065G7
474 Points Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWLIntel Core i5-8265U
401 Points -15%Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723LIntel Core i7-8565U
390 Points -18% CPU (Multi Core)Average of class Multimedia (1887 - 11924, n=71, last 2 years)
5890 Points +282%HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ngIntel Core i7-1065G7
1543 Points Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWLIntel Core i5-8265U
1367 Points -11%Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723LIntel Core i7-8565U
1035 Points -33%
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit691 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit190 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)1543 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)474 Points
Help... in comparison
PCMark 10 - Score
Average of class Multimedia (4325 - 8670, n=61, last 2 years)
6835 Points +59%HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ngGeForce MX250, i7-1065G7, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
4289 Points Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723LGeForce MX250, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
4236 Points -1%Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWLGeForce MX250, i5-8265U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4192 Points -2%Asus VivoBook S15 S532FGeForce MX250, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
4148 Points -3%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ngToshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWLSamsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQAcer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723LWDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512GAsus VivoBook S15 S532FWDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256GCrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6-22%-39%-36% Write 4K181.6157.6 -13%130.1 -28%149.9 -17% Read 4K57.446.39 -19%27.64 -52%46.13 -20% Write Seq19821214 -39%1438 -27%970 -51% Read Seq18991295 -32%1319 -31%1085 -43% Write 4K Q32T1509370.7 -27%323.3 -36%460.8 -9% Read 4K Q32T1545461.1 -15%359.9 -34%410.3 -25% Write Seq Q32T130721888 -39%1454 -53%662 -78% Read Seq Q32T132813540 8%1740 -47%1728 -47%
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSDToshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
3281 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
3072 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
545 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
509 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
1899 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
1982 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
57.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
181.6 MB/s
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSDToshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02Sequential Read:
2762MB/s
Sequential Write:
2493MB/s
4K Read:
52.1MB/s
4K Write:
147.5MB/s
4K-64 Read:
1473MB/s
4K-64 Write:
1456MB/s
Access Time Read:
0.094ms
Access Time Write:
0.03ms
Score Read:
1801Points
Score Write:
1853Points
Score Total:
4568Points
3DMark 11 Performance
4850 points3DMark Time Spy Score
1223 pointsHelp... in comparison
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng GeForce MX250, i7-1065G7, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02: Ø11.2 (7-15)
3DMark | 3DMark 11 3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike GraphicsAverage of class Multimedia (2328 - 34440, n=67, last 2 years)
14201 Points +297%Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWLNVIDIA GeForce MX250
3720 Points +4%Asus VivoBook S15 S532FNVIDIA GeForce MX250
3705 Points +3%Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723LNVIDIA GeForce MX250
3616 Points +1%HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ngNVIDIA GeForce MX250
3580 Points 2560x1440 Time Spy GraphicsAverage of class Multimedia (696 - 13010, n=68, last 2 years)
5432 Points +392%Asus VivoBook S15 S532FNVIDIA GeForce MX250
1111 Points +1%HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ngNVIDIA GeForce MX250
1105 Points Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723LNVIDIA GeForce MX250
1090 Points -1%3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Multimedia (3765 - 45564, n=64, last 2 years)
19721 Points +327%Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWLNVIDIA GeForce MX250
4942 Points +7%Asus VivoBook S15 S532FNVIDIA GeForce MX250
4756 Points +3%Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723LNVIDIA GeForce MX250
4633 Points 0%HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ngNVIDIA GeForce MX250
4614 Points
The Witcher 3
1366x768 Medium Graphics & PostprocessingAverage of class Multimedia (41 - 327, n=24, last 2 years)
144.8 fps +332%Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723LGeForce MX250, i7-8565U
37.9 fps +13%Asus VivoBook S15 S532FGeForce MX250, i7-8565U
36.8 fps +10%Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWLGeForce MX250, i5-8265U
34.5 fps +3%HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ngGeForce MX250, i7-1065G7
33.5 (26min) fps 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)Average of class Multimedia (22 - 242, n=45, last 2 years)
103.2 fps +449%Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723LGeForce MX250, i7-8565U
20.4 fps +9%Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWLGeForce MX250, i5-8265U
19.8 fps +5%Asus VivoBook S15 S532FGeForce MX250, i7-8565U
19.1 fps +2%HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ngGeForce MX250, i7-1065G7
18.8 (15min) fps
lowmed.highultraThe Witcher 3 (2015)
56.4
33.5
18.8
10.9
Resident Evil 7 (2017)
118
53.9
32.1
27
Prey (2017)
108
46.2
36.4
30.1
Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017)
64
27
19
15
ELEX (2017)
53.9
25.4
20.6
15.6
Star Wars Battlefront 2 (2017)
79.1
25.4
21.8
18.7
Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018)
50.7
21.9
18.7
12.7
The Crew 2 (2018)
43.9
20.2
19.5
16.5
Control (2019)
41
14
10.1
Borderlands 3 (2019)
52.9
20.7
13.4
10.2
FIFA 20 (2019)
120
82.4
76.8
62.5
Ghost Recon Breakpoint (2019)
36
19
17
12
GRID 2019 (2019)
65.2
25.2
20.3
11.8
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 (2019)
41.7
23.3
19.4
15.9
Need for Speed Heat (2019)
41.1
20.2
18.4
15.3
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019)
29.4
22.5
18.1
Red Dead Redemption 2 (2019)
20.9
15.2
9.8
6.2
Noise Level
Idle
31 / 36 / 41 dB(A)Load
49 / 49 dB(A)
30 dBsilent40 dB(A)audible50 dB(A)loud
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 30 dB(A)
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ngi7-1065G7, GeForce MX250Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWLi5-8265U, GeForce MX250Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723Li7-8565U, GeForce MX250Asus VivoBook S15 S532Fi7-8565U, GeForce MX250Average of class Multimedia Noise20%13%16%23%off / environment *3029.3 2%29.9 -0%28 7%24.1 ?(19.4 - 26.1, n=71, last 2 years) 20%Idle Minimum *3129.3 5%29.9 4%28 10%24.3 ?(20.6 - 28.2, n=71, last 2 years) 22%Idle Average *3629.3 19%29.9 17%28 22%24.9 ?(20.6 - 31.8, n=71, last 2 years) 31%Idle Maximum *4129.3 29%29.9 27%30 27%26.4 ?(20.6 - 34, n=71, last 2 years) 36%Load Average *4934.4 30%41.7 15%41.4 16%37.7 ?(23.7 - 57.6, n=70, last 2 years) 23%Witcher 3 ultra *4734.4 27%41.5 12%Load Maximum *4934.9 29%41.7 15%41.5 15%45.7 ?(29.4 - 57.8, n=71, last 2 years) 7%* ... smaller is better
Max. LoadIdleWitcher 3
42 °C47 °C46 °C 32 °C45 °C46 °C 27 °C31 °C32 °C
Maximum: 47 °CAverage: 38.7 °C
46 °C47 °C38 °C42 °C39 °C29 °C28 °C26 °C25 °C
Maximum: 47 °CAverage: 35.6 °C Power Supply (max.) 45 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900Max. LoadIdleWitcher 3
24 °C25 °C25 °C 23 °C24 °C25 °C 23 °C23 °C24 °C
Maximum: 25 °CAverage: 24 °C
26 °C26 °C25 °C26 °C26 °C24 °C24 °C24 °C23 °C
Maximum: 26 °CAverage: 24.9 °C Power Supply (max.) 23 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900Max. LoadIdleWitcher 3
40 °C47 °C45 °C 32 °C46 °C45 °C 28 °C32 °C32 °C
Maximum: 47 °CAverage: 38.6 °C
45 °C46 °C40 °C41 °C40 °C30 °C32 °C28 °C28 °C
Maximum: 46 °CAverage: 36.7 °C Power Supply (max.) 47 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.7 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32 °C / 89.6 F) and are therefore not hot. (-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-3.2 °C / -5.8 F).
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ngi7-1065G7, GeForce MX250Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWLi5-8265U, GeForce MX250Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723Li7-8565U, GeForce MX250Asus VivoBook S15 S532Fi7-8565U, GeForce MX250Average of class Multimedia Heat5%-15%-6%-3%Maximum Upper Side *4741.8 11%53.7 -14%45.4 3%42.9 ?(31.8 - 59, n=73, last 2 years) 9%Maximum Bottom *4743.3 8%56 -19%40.8 13%45.6 ?(33 - 62.4, n=73, last 2 years) 3%Idle Upper Side *2525.1 -0%28.4 -14%29.6 -18%27.9 ?(21.2 - 41.7, n=72, last 2 years) -12%Idle Bottom *2625.4 2%28.9 -11%31.2 -20%28.6 ?(21.4 - 39.8, n=72, last 2 years) -10%* ... smaller is better
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.8% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.6% difference to median)Compared to same class» 55% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 37% worse» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%Compared to all devices tested» 40% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 52% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL audio analysis(-) | not very loud speakers (70.5 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.7% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(±) | reduced highs - on average 5.5% lower than median(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23% difference to median)Compared to same class» 80% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 15% worse» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%Compared to all devices tested» 67% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 28% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Power Consumption
Off / Standby 0.2 / 0.7 WattIdle 4 / 7 / 10 Watt
Load
62 / 64 Watt
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ngi7-1065G7, GeForce MX250Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWLi5-8265U, GeForce MX250Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723Li7-8565U, GeForce MX250Asus VivoBook S15 S532Fi7-8565U, GeForce MX250Average of class Multimedia Power Consumption12%1%-25%-50%Idle Minimum *42.74 31%4.4 -10%6 -50%6.52 ?(2.1 - 31.3, n=73, last 2 years) -63%Idle Average *75.64 19%6.9 1%10.3 -47%11.4 ?(4.6 - 38.3, n=73, last 2 years) -63%Idle Maximum *108.4 16%9.9 1%10.5 -5%13.2 ?(6 - 41.6, n=73, last 2 years) -32%Load Average *6261.3 1%55 11%69.1 -11%69.3 ?(15.1 - 147, n=70, last 2 years) -12%Witcher 3 ultra *5849.2 15%57.8 -0%Load Maximum *6469.4 -8%63.4 1%88 -38%114.9 ?(40 - 270, n=73, last 2 years) -80%* ... smaller is better
Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
11h 34min
WiFi Websurfing
6h 08min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 9min
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ngi7-1065G7, GeForce MX250, 41 WhLenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWLi5-8265U, GeForce MX250, 48 WhAcer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723Li7-8565U, GeForce MX250, 48 WhAsus VivoBook S15 S532Fi7-8565U, GeForce MX250, 42 WhAverage of class Multimedia Battery Runtime49%31%1%69%Reader / Idle6941281 85%773 11%655 -6%1262 ?(612 - 2760, n=10, last 2 years) 82%WiFi v1.3368505 37%414 13%306 -17%673 ?(262 - 1204, n=73, last 2 years) 83%Load6987 26%117 70%86 25%98.1 ?(39 - 209, n=47, last 2 years) 42%H.264495388898 ?(319 - 1481, n=43, last 2 years)
Pros+ 高质量的做工（材料，建筑质量）
+ 对比度高且明亮的屏幕
+ 紧凑的尺寸
+ 轻巧时尚的设计Cons- 接口较差
- 键盘不够好
- 漏光
- 烦人的风扇噪音
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng laptop review. Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de.乍一看，Pavilion 14-ce3040ng给人留下了很好的印象。
部分由铝制成的时尚外观设计给我们以轻巧紧凑的印象。这使得该设备特别适合在旅途中使用。
其明亮，对比度高的显示屏是另一个卖点，使14英寸屏幕在竞争中脱颖而出。 另一方面，它的输入设备，连接性和续航时间只算中规中矩。
惠普在风扇曲线方面犯了决定性的错误。风扇即使在空载时也达到40 dB（A），在负载下也达到近50 dB（A）。在当前状态下，我们建议您将目光投向其他地方，除非您不会被喧闹而烦人的风扇所劝退。
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
- 05/14/2020 v7 (old)
Florian Glaser
Chassis75 / 98 → 77%
Keyboard73%
Pointing Device81%
Connectivity52 / 80 → 65%
Weight68 / 20-72 → 93%
Battery70 / 95 → 73%
Display84%
Games Performance62 / 90 → 69%
Application Performance90 / 90 → 100%
Temperature87%
Noise64 / 95 → 67%
Audio75%
Camera35 / 85 → 41%
Average71%
78%
Multimedia - Weighted Average
Price comparison
Editor of the original article: Alex Alderson - Senior Tech Writer - 12655 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018contact me via: @aldersonaj, BlueskyTranslator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 560746 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008contact me via:
Please share our article, every link counts!